Get Permission Ravindranath, Swaroop, Ghosh, Devaraj, Shale K S, and Krishn: A clinico-epidemiological study on various patterns of facial dermatoses in adolescents attending a rural tertiary centre: A cross-sectional study


Introduction

Adolescence is a critical phase of transition with a myriad of hormonal changes occurring in the body to which skin reacts in various ways. They are affected by various dermatological diseases as a result of the hormonal changes and increased exposure to the external environment. They experience difficulties associated with the transition from a structured family setting to the uncertainties of adult world.

The WHO defines adolescence as the period ranging between 10 and 19 years of age. Dermatological complaints are among the common causes for out patient visits in this age group. Adolescent self-esteem is easily threatened when a highly visible skin disorder becomes the focus for unwelcome peer attention. Since adolescents constitute one fifth of the Indian population, dermatological disorders have an impact on their health- related quality of life, especially when it occurs on face leading to considerable physical and psychological morbidity.

Although there is a considerable prevalence of adolescent facial diseases, the existence of only few studies on this subject makes the planning of health actions difficult. The importance of the current study lies in the need for an epidemiological survey to acsess the prevalence of facial skin diseases in adolescents in developing countries to help implement preventive measures to decrease their prevalence.

Objectives

  1. To study the prevalence of various facial dermatoses among adolescents (10-19 years).

  2. To study the clinical and epidemiological determinants of facial dermatoses among adolescent patients.

Materials and Methods

A total of 550 adolescents in the age group of 10-19 years presenting with facial dermatoses to the outpatient department of Dermatology, Adichunchunagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagara meeting the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this observational cross-sectional study after taking an informed consent from the guardian (for patients <18 yrs) and approval of institutional ethical committee. A detailed history and thorough clinical examination was recorded in a structured proforma. The diagnosis was based on detailed history and thorough clinical examination, and relevant investigations were done when needed.

Study place

This study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, B.G. Nagara on an OPD basis.

Study duration

The duration of study was 18 months (1st January 2018 – 30th June 2019: 12 months for data collection and 6 months for data analysis and compilation)

Study design

Cross-sectional observational study

Sample size

All patients meeting the below mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria attending the OPD within the study period were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adolescent patients between the age group of 10-19 years with facial dermatoses attending the Out Patient Department of Dermatology.

  2. Adolescent patients above 18 years of age who were willing to participate in the study.(Self consent)

  3. Parents/Guardians who gave an informed consent (for adolescent patients less than 18 Years) for enrolling their child in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Adolescent patients above 18 years who were not willing to participate in the study.

  2. Patients who were below 10 years and above 19 years.

  3. Parents/Guardians who were not giving an informed consent (for adolescent patients less than 18 years) for enrolling their child in the study.

Procedure of study

All patients from 10 years to 19 years, satisfying the above mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited in the study. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee and an informed consent was taken from the patients or their parents (for adolescent patients less than 18 years) included in the study.

After informed written consent, a detailed clinical history as per pretested and structured questionnaire including age, sex, presenting skin lesions, its onset, duration, progression, aggravating and relieving factors, past medical history, personal history followed by elaborate general and systemic examination was recorded in the standard proforma.

A detailed dermatological examination of each patient was done with emphasis on morphology, pattern and distribution of skin lesions on the face.

The diagnosis was based on detailed history and thorough clinical examination, and relevant laboratory investigations were done when needed.

Analysis

The data collected was entered into a specially designed Case Record Form and was presented in the form of percentage, mean and standard deviation. It was then subjected to statistical analysis and expressed in percentages and proportions.

Results

The observational study was conducted among 550 patients belonging to adolescent age group (10–19 years) with facial dermatoses. They constituted 7.3% of the total OPD attendance and 18.1% of the total adolescents attending the OPD during the study. The prevalence of facial dermatoses in adolescent population was 7.3.

Figure 1

Gender distribution in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image1.png

The mean age of the sample population was 15.79 ± 2.6 years.

Out of the 550 adolescents with facial dermatoses, 346 (62.9%) were females and 204 (37.1%) were males. An overall female preponderance was seen with male to female ratio being 1:1.4.

The following were the observations from the present study:

In the present study, infections, eczema, acne vulgaris and steroid induced facies showed association with socioeconomic status.

  1. Infections were found to be most common in lower middle class (46.4%) and middle class (26.2%) of socio-economic status. Among infections, bacterial infections were equally distributed among middle class (36.4%) and lower middle class (36.4%), followed by 27.2% in the lower class of socio-economic status. Fungal infections were most common in lower middle class (60.9%) followed by lower class (21.7%), middle class (15.2%) and upper class (2.2%) of socioeconomic status. Viral infections were the most common in middle class (40.7%) followed by lower middle class (26%), upper middle class (18.5%) and lower class (14.8%).

  2. Eczema were common in the lower middle class (38.5%) and middle class (33%). Among eczemas, seborrheic dermatitis was distributed equally among middle class (33.3%) and lower middle class (33.3%), followed by lower class (30%). Pityriasis alba was the commonest in lower middle class (47.9%) followed by lower class (39.1%). Irritant contact dermatitis was the commonest in middle class (66.7%) followed by lower middle class (33.3%). In perioral dermatitis, 66.7% cases belonged to lower middle class and 33.3% cases belonged to upper middle class.

Figure 2

Distribution of common dermatoses based on socioeconomic status

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image2.png

The most common type of dermatoses found in our study were appendageal disorders, constituting a total of 44.5% of the total study population, followed by infections (15.3%), eczema(12.9%), pigmentary disorders (8.7%), miscellaneous disorders (4.9%), polymorphic light eruption(3.7%), steroid induced facies (3.6%), nevus (2.4%), erythromelanosis follicularis faciei et colli (2%), vascular disorders (1.5%) and papulosquamous disorders (0.5%).

Table 1

Relation of pattern of facial dermatoses with gender

Dermatoses Total number% Males Females
No (%) No (%)
1). INFECTION 84 (15.3%) 47(55.9%) 37 (44.1%)
Bacterial
• Impetigo 8 (1.5%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%)
• Cellulitis 3 (0.5%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%)
Total 11 (2%) 5 (45.5%) 6 (55%)
Fungal
• Tinea faciei 26 (4.8%) 12 (46.2%) 14 (53.8%)
•Pityriasis versicolor 20 (3.6%) 14 (70%) 6 (30%)
Total 46 (8.4%) 26 (56.5%) 20 (43.5%)
Viral
• Verruca plana 20 (3.6%) 15 (75%) 5 (25%)
• Molluscum contagiosum 7 (1.3%) 1 (14.3%) 6 (85.7%)
Total 27 (4.9%) 16 (59.3%) 11 (40.7%)
2). ECZEMA
• Irritant contact dermatitis 15 (2.7%) 7 (46.7%) 8 (53.3%)
• Seborrheic dermatitis 30 (5.5%) 9 (30%) 21 (70%)
• Pityriasis alba 23 (42%) 19 (82.6%) 2 (66.7%)
• Perioral dermatitis 3 (0.5%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%)
Total 71 (12.9%) 36 (50.7%) 35 (49.3%)
3). PIGMENTARY DISORDERS
• Vitiligo 8 (1.4%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%)
• Freckles 10 (1.8%) 2(20%) 6 (80%)
• Lentigens 10 (1.8%) 4 (40%) 6 (60%)
• Post inflammatory hyperpigmentation 20 (3.7%) 4 (20%) 16 (80%)
Total 48 (8.7%) 12 (25%) 36 (75%)
4). PAPULOSQUAMOUS DISORDERS
• Pityriasis rosea 3(0.5%) 1(33.3%) 2 (66.7%)
Total 3(0.5%) 1(33.3%) 2 (66.7%)

Table 2

Relation of pattern of facial dermatoses with gender

Dermatoses Total number(%) Males Females
No (%) No (%)
5). APPENDAGEAL DISORDERS
• Acne vulgaris 191 (34.8%) 49 (25.7%) 142 (74.3%)
Grade 1 85 (15.5%) 22 (25.9%) 142 (74.3%)
Grade 2 60 (10.9%) 11 (18.3%) 49 (81.7%)
Grade 3 132 (5.8%) 12 (37.5%) 20 (62.5%)
Grade 4 14 (2.6%) 4 (28.6%) 10 (71.4%)
• Post acne scars 26 (4.7%) 10 (38.5%) 16 (61.5%)
• Trichostasis spinulosa 14 (2.5%) 4 (28.6%) 10 (71.4%)
• Hirsutism 14 (2.5%) 0 14 (100%)
Total 245 (44.5%) 63 (25.7%) 182 (74.3%)
6). VASULAR
• Rosacea 3 (0.6%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%)
• Pyogenic granuloma 5 (0.9%) 0 5 (100%)
Total 8 (1.5%) 1 (12.5%) 7 (87.5%)
7). NEVUS
• Nevus sebaceous 2 (0.4%) 0 2 (100%)
• Linear epidermal verrucous nevus 2 (0.4%) 0 2 (100%)
• Nevus of Ota 4 (0.7%) 1 (25%) 3 (75%)
•Congenital Melanocytic Nevus 5 (0.9%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%)
Total 13 (2.4%) 2 (15.4%) 11 (78.6%)
8). DISORDER OF KERATINISATION
•Keratosis pilaris (Erythromelanosis follicularis faciei et colli) 11 (2%) 4 (36.4%) 7 (63.6%)
Total 11 (2%) 4 (36.4%) 7 (63.6%)
9). IDIOPATIC PHOTODERMATOSES
•Polymorphic light eruption 20 (3.6%) 14 (70%) 6 (30%)
Total 20 (3.6%) 14 (70%) 6 (30%)
10). STEROID INDUCED FACIES 20 (3.6%) 7 (35%) 13 (65%)
11). MISCELLANEOUS
• Keloid 9 (1.6%) 2 (22.2%) 7 (77.8%)
• Hypertrophic scar 8 (1.4%) 2 (25%) 6 (75%)
• Morphea (en coupe de sabre) 2 (0.4%) 2 (100%) 0
• Dermatoses papulosa nigra 6 (1.1%) 4 (66.7%) 2 (33.3%)
• Adenoma sebaceum 2 (0.4%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
Total 27 (4.8%) 11c (40.7%) 16 (59.3%)

[i] Table 1 Continued

Figure 3

Distribution of various facialdermatoses in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image3.png
Figure 4

Distribution of various facialdermatoses based on their gender

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image4.png

Among 11 cases of bacterial infections, impetigo was the most common, seen in 8 (72.7%) patients followed by cellulitis in 3 (27.3%) patients.

Figure 5

Distribution of patients according to their diagnosis of bacterial infections

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image5.png

Of the 46 cases of fungal infections, tinea faciei was seen in 26(56.5%) patients and pityriasis versicolor in 20(43.5%) patients.

Figure 6

Tinea faciei   

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image6.png
Figure 7

Distribution of patients according to their diagnosis of fungal infections

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image7.png

Among the viral infections, verruca plana was the most common (20;74.1%) followed by molluscum contagiosum (7;25.9%).

Figure 8

Wart

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image8.png
Figure 9

Distribution of patients based on their diagnosis of viral infections

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image9.png
Figure 10

Distribution of various patterns of infection in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image10.png

Eczema constituted 12.9 % of the total population. Among these, seborrhoeic dermatitis (30;42.3%) was the most common followed by pityriasis alba (23;32.4%), irritant contact dermatitis (15;21.1%) and perioral dermatitis (3;4.2%).

Figure 11

Distribution of eczema in the study population.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image11.png

Pigmentary dermatoses constituted 8.7% of the study population. Among these, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (20;41.7%) was the most common followed by freckles (10;20.8%), lentigen (10;20.8%) and vitiligo (8;16.7%).

Figure 12

Freckles

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image12.png
Figure 13

Distribution of various patterns of pigmentary disorders

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image13.png

Appendageal disorders constituted 44.5% of the total study. Of the appendageal disorders, acne vulgaris was the most common constituting 78% (191 cases), post acne scars 10.6% (26 cases), trichostasis spinulosa 5.7% (14 cases) and hirsutism 5.7% (14 cases).

Figure 14

Distribution of appendageal disorders in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image14.png

Of the cases of acne, grade 1 (85;44.5%) was the most common followed by grade 2 (60;31.4%), grade 3 (32;16.8%) and grade 4 (14;7.3%).

Figure 15

Acne vulgaris

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image15.png
Figure 16

Distribution of various grades of acne vulgaris

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image16.png

Vascular causes of facial dermatoses in adolescents (8 cases) constituted 1.5% of the total study population. Of this, 5 cases of pyogenic granuloma constituted 62.5% and 3 cases of rosacea constituted 37.5% of the vascular causes.

Figure 17

Distribution of vascular disorders in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image17.png

Nevi constituted 2.4% of the study population. The most common type of nevi was congenital melanocytic nevi (5;38.4%), followed by nevus of ota (4;30.8%), nevus sebaceous (2;15.4%) and linear verrucous epidermal nevus (2;15.4%).

Figure 18

Linear verrucous epidermal nevi

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image18.png
Figure 19

Distribution of various patterns of nevi in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image19.png

The only keratinisation disorder of face in adolescents observed in our study was keratosis pilaris of face (erythromelanosis follicularis faciei et colli) and constituted 2% (11 cases) of the study sample.

The miscellaneous group in the study were 6.9% of the total population and it included cases of keloid (9;33.3%), hypertrophic scar (8;29.6%), morphea- en coupe de sabre (2;7.4%), dermatoses papulosa nigra (6;22.3%) and adenoma sebaceum (2;7.4%).

Figure 20

Distribution of various miscellaneous disorders in the study population

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/0f14d38d-3f73-41d1-a526-c6c2ca2f01c2image20.png

Discussion

Skin disorders are fairly common among adolescent age group (10–19 years).1 They are affected by various dermatological diseases as a result of the hormonal changes and increased exposure to the external environment. They experience difficulties associated with the transition from a structured family setting to the uncertainties of the adult world. The impact on quality of life can be enormous during this psychologically vulnerable period of adolescence. These physiological changes that occur in the skin during puberty and adolescence have several effects, and this may also be a reason for seeking medical advice in many cases.2 There were only a single comparative study by Radhamani et al. on facial dermatoses in adolescent population.3

Prevalance

In our study, the prevalence of facial dermatoses in adolescent population was 7.3. They constituted 18.1% of the adolescents attending the OPD during the study period. Since there was paucity of similar studies, we couldn’t compare our study results.

Mean age of population

Mean age of patients in our study was 15.79 years which was similar to the study done by Radhamani et al.(16.22 years). 3

Sex distribution

In the present study, an over all female preponderance was observed with male to female ratio being 1:1.4. Our study results were similar to the study done by Radhamani et al. who also noticed a female preponderance (1:2.3).

This observation could be attributed to females being more conscious about their appearance and thus seeking medical care earlier.

Socioeconomic status

In the present study, infections and eczemas were found to have an association with the socio-economic status as per modified B.G. Prasad socioeconomic classification.4 Infections were found to be most common in lower middle (46.4%) and middle class (26.2%) of socio-economic status. Eczemas were found to be most common in lower middle (38.5%) and middle class (33%) of socio-economic status.

However the results of our study could not be compared to any other study due to paucity of similar studies.

The increased incidence of the infections and eczemas in lower socioeconomic status could be attributed to poor personal hygiene, overcrowding and lack of health awareness in the community. The increased incidence of steroid induced facies among these patients, could be due to lack of awareness and easy over the counter availability of topical corticosteroids.

Pattern of dermatoses

In our study, majority of the patients presented with acne vulgaris (34.8%) followed by infections (15.3%) and eczema (12.9%). Our study results were in concordance with study by Radhamani et al. where the most common dermatoses was acne vulgaris (20%) followed by folliculitis (16%) and pityriasis versicolor (15%).3

Acne vulgaris

  1. In the present study, acne vulgaris was the most common dermatoses constituting 34.8% of the study population.

  2. Of the 191 patients with acne vulgaris, 49 (25.7%) were males and 142 (74.3%) were females. Thus, acne vulgaris showed a female preponderance in our study (M:F ratio =1:3). This was in concordance with studies by Radamani et al. (M:F ratio= 1:2.3), Henshaw EB et al. (M:F ratio =1:1.3), Reddy VS et al. (M:F ratio = 1:1.01) and Kawshar T et al. (M:F ratio= 1:1.5).1, 5, 6, 7 In contrary, studies by Pandey P et al. (1.04:1) and Hmar et al. (1:1.1) reported a male preponderance.2, 8

  3. In the present study, majority of patients had grade 1 acne – 85 (44.5%) cases followed by grade 2 – 60 (31.4%) cases, grade 3- 32 (16.8%) cases and grade 4- 14 (7.3%) cases. This was in concordance with study done by Smithard A et al. (very mild acne -22%, mild acne- 17%, moderate to severe acne- 11%).9 In contrary, study done by Krowchuk et al. observed moderate acne in 41%, severe acne in 28% and very severe in 3 % of patients.10

  4. The spurt of acne vulgaris at adolescence could be attributed to the role of androgens, which target the sebaceous glands. At puberty, the spurt of hormones especially of androgens, stimulate sebaceous glands to secrete sebum, playing a major role in pathogenesis of acne vulgaris during this phase of adolescence.

Infections

  1. The second most common dermatoses in our study were infections which was observed in 15.3% of the study population.

  2. In the current study, among the infections, fungal infections were most common (8.4%), followed by viral (4.9%) and bacterial (2%) infections. However Radhamani et al. observed that bacterial infections were the most common (16%) followed by fungal (15%) and viral (6%) infections.3

  3. Out of the 46 patients having fungal infections, tinea faciei was the most common (26 cases- 56.5%) followed by pityriasis versicolor (20 cases- 43.5%). However Radhamani et al. in their study observed pityriasis versicolor (15%) to be the most common fungal infection.3 Fungal infections showed a male preponderance in comparison to females (M:F=1.3:1).

  4. Out of the 27 patients having viral infections, verruca plana was the most common (20 cases-74.1%) followed by molluscum contagiosum (7 cases-25.9%). This was similar to study done by Radhamani et al, who found viral warts (6%) to be the most common viral infection. Viral infections showed a male preponderance in comparison to females (M:F= 1.5:1).3

  5. In the current study, out of the 11 patients having bacterial infections, impetigo was the most common (72.7%) followed by cellulitis (27.3%). In contrary, Radhamani et al. found folliculitis (16%) as the most common bacterial infection followed by furuncle (9%). Bacterial infections showed a female preponderance in comparison to males (M:F=1:1.2).3

  6. Lack of health awareness, ignorance regarding diseases and failure to understand the importance of cleanliness, poor personal hygiene, poverty and overcrowding, increased exposure and enhanced outdoor activity would have been the important factors that may have contributed to higher prevalence of infections in our study.

Eczema

  1. In the present study, seborrhoeic dermatitis (5.5%) was the most common followed by pityriasis alba (4.2%), irritant contact dermatitis (2.7%) and perioral dermatitis (0.5%). In contrary Radhamani et al. observed contact dermatitis as the most common eczema (14%) in their study. 3

  2. Of the 71 cases of eczema, 36 (50.7%) were males and 35 (49.3%) were females. Thus in our study, eczema showed a slight male preponderance (M:F=1.03:1)

  3. The incidence of irritant contact dermatitis in our study was 2.7% (15 cases)

  4. Perioral dermatitis constituted 0.5% of the population. Of the 3 cases, 1(33.3%) case was a male and 2 (66.7%) cases were females, showing female preponderance (M:F=1:2).

Pigmentary disorders

  1. In the current study, pigmentary disorders constituted 8.7% of the study. Among the pigmentary disorders, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was most common (3.75%), followed by freckles (1.8%), lentigens (1.8%) and vitiligo (1.4%). However, due to paucity of similar studies, our study results couldn’t be compared with any other study.

  2. An over all female preponderance was seen in comparison to males. (M:F=1:3).

  3. This could be a consequence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation to either acne lesions, inflammatory lesions or infective lesions, all of which were the most commonly seen dermatoses in this study.

Nevi

  1. Nevi constituted 2.4% of the total dermatoses in our study. Congenital menalocytic nevi (0.9%) was the most common nevi followed by nevus of ota (0.7%), nevus sebaceous (0.4%) and linear epidermal veruccous nevi (0.4%). The study by Radhamani et al. found epidermal nevi as the most common nevi (8%).3 Nevi showed a female preponderance in the present study(M:F =1:5.5).

Keloid and hypertrophic scar

  1. Keloid constituted 0.8% and hypertrophic scar 0.8% of the of the study population.

  2. Both keloids (M:F =1:4) and hypertrophic scars (M:F=1:3) showed female preponderance.

Disorder of keratinisation

  1. Keratosis pilaris of face i.e. erythromelanosis follicularis faciei et colli was the only keratinization disorder observed with a prevalence of 2% in our study.

  2. Of the 11 cases of keratosis pilaris on face, 4 (36.4%) cases were males and 7 (63.6%) cases were females, thus showing a female preponderance (M:F=1:1.8).

Papulosquamous disorders

  1. In the present study, papulosquamous disorders were observed in 0.5% of the total population, and all cases (4 cases) reported were of pityriasis rosea.

  2. Of the 3 cases of pityriasis rosea, 1 (33.3%) case was male and 2 (66.7%)cases were females, showing a female preponderance (M:F=1:2)

  3. However the results of our study could not be compared to any other study due to paucity of similar studies

Idiopathic photodermatoses

  1. In the current study, polymorphic light eruption constituted 3.7% of the total dermatoses.

  2. In our study, out of the 20 cases of polymorphic light eruption, 14 (70%) cases were males and 6(30%) cases were males, thus showing a male preponderance.

Conclusion

The prevalence of adolescent facial dermatoses in the study population was 7.3%. Infections and eczema were observed most commonly in lower middle class of socioeconomic status. Acne vulgaris was the most common dermatoses observed followed by infections and eczema.

Facial dermatoses are a major cause of emotional, personal, behavioral and social difficulties in adolescents. They even contribute to psychosocial problems including depression and low self-esteem especially in patients with acne vulgaris. Thus, it is prudent to recognize, intervene and treat facial dermatoses at the earliest to prevent the psychological sequelae. Infections were commonly seen in our study, and this could be attributed to poverty, overcrowding and poor hygiene. Proper health education to patients and families regarding the mode of spread of infections and the importance of personal hygiene is the need of the hour. Knowledge about the pattern of adolescent facial dermatoses will help us in disease control, implementation of adequate preventive strategies and in creating public awareness regarding the cause and course of various facial dermatoses.

Limitations

As this was an OPD-based study, the number of study population was limited and this may or may not accurately reflect the community data.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

1 

World Health Organization, SEAR office UNICEF press releasewww.unicef

2 

Pooja Pandey Mavinrkainahalli Suresh Vaibhav Dubey Prabhat Pandey A cross-sectional study on quality of life among acne vulgaris patientsInt J Dermatol 201641148005

3 

M Radhamani J A Rahim Skin disorders of the face in adolescent populationInt J Sci Res2015517934

4 

V K Pandey P Aggarwal R Kakkar Modified BG Prasad Socio-economic Classification, Update - 2019Indian J Comm Health2019311235

5 

Daniel P. Krowchuk Terry Stancin Rosemary Keskinen Robin Walker Jonathan Bass Trina M. Anglin The Psychosocial Effects of Acne on AdolescentsPediatr Dermatol 1991843323

6 

Thyvalappil Anoop VenkataSubba Reddy Sreenivasan Ajayakumar Sudhamani Bindurani Sridharan Rajiv Joy Bifi Study of clinical spectrum of pediatric dermatoses in patients attending a Tertiary Care Center in North KeralaIndian J Paediatr Dermatol 201617426772

7 

Toraub Kawshar Jeewon Rajesh Sociodemographic factors and their association to prevalence of skin diseases among adolescentsOur Dermatol Online2013432816

8 

Vanlalhriatpuii Hmar Nandakishore Singh Th.Bijayanti Devi Romita Bachaspatimayum DeepaMala Subba Kapila Verma Pattern of dermatoses among adolescents attending a tertiary care center in Northeast IndiaIndian J Paediatr Dermatol 20171832146

9 

A. Smithard C. Glazebrook H.C. Williams Acne prevalence, knowledge about acne and psychological morbidity in mid-adolescence: a community-based studyBr J Dermatol 200114522749

10 

Eshan Henshaw Olayinka Olasode Evelyn Ogedegbe Imaobong Etuk Dermatologic conditions in teenage adolescents in NigeriaAdolescent Health Med Ther 201457987



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijced.2020.027


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2597

PDF Downloaded: 889