Get Permission Agrawal, Varma, Kumar, Bhargava, Mahadik, and Agrawal: Comparison of oral versus topical tranexamic acid for treatment of melasma


Introduction

Pigmentary disorders are reported as the main cause of demand for dermatological care by 23.6% of men and 29.9% of women.1 Melasma is an acquired pigmentary condition, characterised by irregular brown macules and patches symmetrically distributed on sun-exposed areas of the body. 20–30% of indian women between 20 and 40 years old are affected by melisma.2 It primarily affects women and shows up symmetrically on body regions that are exposed to the sun.3 Melasma is generally a clinical diagnosis consisting of three predominant facial patterns: centrofacial, malar, and mandibular. The major clinical pattern in 50–80% of cases is the centrofacial pattern, which affects the forehead, nose, and upper lip, excluding the philtrum, cheeks, and chin.4, 5 The malar pattern is restricted to the malar cheeks on the face, while mandibular melasma is present on the jawline and chin. Extra-facial melasma can occur on non-facial body parts, including the neck, sternum, forearms, and upper extremities.4 It is most commonly seen in middle-aged women. Melasma can be divided on the basis of morphology – epidermal, dermal, and mixed. Epidermal: characterised by dark brown patches with a well-defined border. Mixed - most common type is characterised by a combination of light and dark brown patches and bluish discoloration. Dermal characterization is characterised by light brown and bluish patches with an ill-defined border.

Causes of melasma include a genetic component, as >30% have a family history of melasma, elevated levels of oestrogen and progesterone during pregnancy, contraceptive pill, hormone replacement therapy, thyroid disease, drugs including dilantin, an anti-malarial drug, tetracycline, minocycline, use of cosmetic products, malnutrition, liver dysfunction, B12 deficiency and UVA, UVB, and visible light exposure causing peroxidation of lipids in cellular membranes, leading to generation of free radicals, which stimulate melanogenesis.

Pregnant women are more prone to alterations to their skin and its appendages during pregnancy due to immunologic, endocrine, metabolic, and vascular changes.6 Scientists now think of melasma as the stress mask since anxiety features and psychotropics have recently been found to be intimately related to the onset of the condition.7 The basic histological abnormalities identified in melasma, melanogenesis, and melanocytosis, are thought to grow as a result of all the variables.8 As such, no investigation is necessary, but the wood’s lamp examination can be used to identify the depth of melanin pigmentation and determine the type of melasma – epidermal, dermal, or mixed. The severity of facial melasma can be estimated by using colorimetry, mexametry, and the MASI score (Melasma Area and Severity Index). (lutein/zeaxanthin). Tranexemic acid is a fibrinolytic agent that has a role in the inhibition of paracrine melanogenic factors that normally stimulate melanogenesis.9 Therefore, it has been evaluated for the treatment of melasma in topical and oral formulations with varying efficacy and safety, which requires further large-scale randomised controlled trials.10 No thromboembolic adverse events have been reported even though low doses of oral TA, an anti-fibrinolytic with potential side effects including deep vein thrombosis, significant pulmonary embolism, and acute myocardial infarction, have been used to treat melisma.11

Materials and Methods

84 Patients with melasma were selected for the study after a thorough clinical examination. Patients were evaluated clinically and randomly categorised into two groups, namely A and B. Group A patients were administered oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily, and patients in group B applied topical 5% tranexamic acid to designated sites on their faces twice daily, along with sunscreen three times daily in both groups.

MASI scoring was performed every four weeks. Clinical evaluation of melasma severity was performed at baseline at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The area of the face is divided into 4 parts according to MASI: 30% forehead, 30% right malar, 30% left malar, and 10% chin.

Melasma severity is assessed by three variables:

  1. A-percentage of total area involved on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90–100% involvement).

  2. D-darkness on a scale of 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum)

  3. H-homogeneity hyperpigmentation on a scale of 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximum) now.

  4. MASI is then calculated by the equation: (DF+HF) AF + 0.3 (DMR+HMR) AMR + 0.1 (DC+HC) AC.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with clinical features suggestive of melasma

Exclusion criteria

  1. Pregnant females.

  2. Women taking contraceptive pills during studies.

  3. Patients taking drugs like tetracycline, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, phenytoin, and spironolactone.

  4. Patients on anticoagulants or having any bleeding disorders.

  5. Patients have impaired renal function test.

Results

Table 1

Characteristics of participants

Patients characteristics

Frequency

Age (Years)

≤ 30 =28

31-40 = 35

41-50 = 17

> 50 = 4

Duration of melasmsa

≤ 6 Months = 36

> 6 Months = 48

Sex

Female = 68

Male = 16

Fitzpatrick skin type

Type III = 11   

Type IV = 46

Type V = 27

Family history

Present = 55   

Absent = 29

History of endocrine disease

Present = 15 Absent = 69

Clinical type

Centrofacial = 59

Malar = 25

Mandibular = 00

Morphological type

Epidermal = 17

Dermal = 12

Mixed = 55

Table 2

I:The mean MASI score of the baseline and all reassessment visits after treatment with oral TXA VS Topical TXA

Oral TXA

Topical TXA

P value

Pre MASI score

20.50

19.90

0.437

MASI at 4 Weeks

14.55

16.19

0.014

MASI At 8 Weeks

10.98

13

0.001

MASI at 12 Weeks

7.93

9.45

0.005

P value

0.00

0.00

Table 3

The amount of changes in the mean MASI score of each group

The amount of changes in the mean masiscore of each group

Groups

Baseline-week 4

Week 4 –week 8

Weeks-week 12

P value

Groupa (oral TXA )

5.95

3.57

3.05

0.00

Groupb (topical TXA )

3.17

3.19

3.55

0.00

Table 4

The frequency (Percentage) of side effects in two groups

Groups

Yes

No

Oral TXA

6 ( 14.2 % )

36 ( 85. 7 % )

Topical TXA

5 (11.1 % )

37 ( 11. 9 % )

Table 5

Comparison of results with other studies

Study l Pooja J. Sahu et al 3

Study 2 Vinod K. Khorana et al 4

Study 3 Bahareh Ebrahimi et al 5

Our study

Total patients

60

64

50

84

Age

Age group -18 -50 years

Age group -20 to 50 years

Age group = more than 18 years

Age group -20 - 60 years

Sex

Female- 55;Male -5

Female -54 ; Male -10

Female -50

Female -68 ;Male -16

Clinical type

Centrofacial -20 Malar -39 Mandibular -1

Centrofacial -27 Malar -37 Mandibula r -0

All   malar   patients   were included.

Centrofacial -59 Malar -25 Mandibular -0

Morphological type

Comparison not done

Epidermal - 17 Dermal - 3 Mixed -24

All Epidermal melasma were chosen.

Epidermal - 17 Dermal -12 Mixed -55

Treatment received

20 patients - oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily. 20   patients   -topical Tranexamic acid . 20 patients   - Modified Kligman's regimen

32 patients - oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily. 20 patients -localized microinjections ( 4mg/ml ) of tranexamic acid monthly.

Group   A   -   topical   3% tranexamic acid Group B -3% hydroquinone and 0.01% dexamethasone.

42 patients - oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily. 42   patients   -topical   5   O/o Tranexamic acid.

Pre MASI Score

Oral TXA-13.35 Topical TXA -14.39

Oral TXA -7.48± 3.73

Topical TXA- 31.68 ±10.32

Oral TXA -20.50 Topical TXA-19.90

MASI at 4 weeks

Oral TXA-13.28 Pvalue - 0.040 Topical TXA - 14.33P value -0.131

Comparison at 4th weeknot done

Topical TXA -22.60 ± 10.37 P value -0.31

Oral TXA-14.55 Pvalue - 0.000 Topical TXA -16.19P value -0.000

MASI at 8 weeks

Oral TXA - 10.81 P value -0.0001 Topical TXA-13.93 P value -0.001

Comparison at 8th week not done

Topical TXA-15.84± 12.01 P value -0.38

Oral TXA-10.98 P value -0.000 Topical TXA -13 P value -0.000

MASI at 12 weeks

Comparison not done

Oral TXA -3.18 ± 1.93 P value -<0.01

Topical TXA-10.76 ± 9.43 P value -0.91

Oral TXA -7.93 P value -0.000 Topical TXA -9.45 P value -0.000

Graph 1

The mean MASI score of the baseline and all reassessment visits after treatment with oral TXA VS topical TXA

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/50faa411-845b-4f4f-8dbe-3a64d8cae6a6image1.png

Graph 2

The amount of changes in the mean MASI score of each group

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/50faa411-845b-4f4f-8dbe-3a64d8cae6a6image2.png

Figure 1

Pre-treatment

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/50faa411-845b-4f4f-8dbe-3a64d8cae6a6image3.png

Figure 2

Post-treatment with oral tranexemic acid

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/50faa411-845b-4f4f-8dbe-3a64d8cae6a6image4.png

Figure 3

Pre-treatment

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/50faa411-845b-4f4f-8dbe-3a64d8cae6a6image5.png

Figure 4

Post-treatment with oral tranexemic acid

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/50faa411-845b-4f4f-8dbe-3a64d8cae6a6image6.png

84 cases were included in this study, of which 28 patients were younger than or equal to 30 and 35 patients were in the age group 31–40. 36 patients had a history of melasma of less than 6 months, and 48 patients had a history of more than 6 months. Of the 84 cases, 16 were male and 48 were female. The patients were categorised into two groups. Group A – oral tranexamic acid 250 mg twice daily, whereas Group B – topical 5% tranexamic acid for 12 weeks. The mean MASI score at baseline with oral TXA and topical TXA was 20.50 and 19.90, respectively, which by the end of the 12th week reached 7.93 and 9.45 (p value = 0.005) (Table 1). The changes in the MASI scores of both groups were statistically significant during the study period. The amount of change in the mean MASI score of both groups was statistically significant in all reassessment visits (p value 0.00) (Table 2) (Table 3) (Figure 1) (Figure 2). More systemic side effects were observed (abdominal pain, nausea, and oligomenorrhea), and some topical side effects were observed (erythema, skin irritation, and xerosis).

Discussion

Melasma is a common acquired dermatosis characterised by the presence of light-to-dark brown macules and patches involving the sun-exposed areas of the face and neck. Traditionally, the mainstays of treatment for melasma have been topical bleaching agents and strict photoprotection. Additional adjuvant treatment modalities include chemical peels, dermabrasion, and laser treatments, all of which have demonstrated limited efficacy. 12, 13 Recently, there has been an interest in studying the effects of tranexamic acid (TA) on melasma. TA has been evaluated for the treatment of melasma in various formulations, including topical, intradermal, and oral. 12 TA is a fibrinolytic agent that has antiplasmin properties. It has been hypothesised that TA can inhibit the release of paracrine melanogenic factors that normally stimulate melanocytes. In our study of 84 patients, the mean MASI score at 12 weeks after starting treatment in patients who received oral tranexamic acid was 7.93 and in patients receiving topical tranexamic acid was 9.45. Both groups had a reduction in MASI score, and the p value in both groups is 0.000, which is highly significant. In study 1 by Vinod K. Khurana et al, the mean MASI score at the 12th week with oral tranexamic acid was 3.18±1.93, and the p value was highly significant. 14 In the study by Bahareh Ebrahimi et al mean MASI score at the 12th week in patients receiving topical TXA is 10.76±9.43 which means that with the use of topical TXA, a reduction in MASI score was observed. 15

Conclusion

Melasma is a pigmentary disorder affecting mainly the face. Various treatment modalities are available, such as topicals, superficial chemical peels, and lasers, but none has yet given promising results, the quest for the best treatment modality is on. According to the above study, both modalities of treatment of melasma with topical TA and oral TA are effective, but a comparative analysis suggested that results were better with oral tranexamic acid than topical tranexamic acid. Patient compliance was higher with oral tranexamic acid. It was also observed that there were more gastro-intestinal side effects with oral TA, like abdominal pain, nausea, and oligomenorrhea, and some topical side effects were observed with topical 5% tranexamic acid, like erythema, skin irritation, and xerosis.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A C Handel LDB Miot HA Miot Melasma: a clinical and epidemiological reviewAn Bras Dermatol201489577182

2 

V Hourblin S Nouveau N Roy Skin complexion and pigmentary disorders of facial skin in 1204 women in 4 Indian citiesIndian J Dermolol Venereol, leprol201480539540110.4103/0378-6323.140290

3 

LD Miot HA Miot MG Silva ME Marques Physiopathology of melasmaAn Bras Dermatol20098466233510.1590/s0365-05962009000600008

4 

OA Ogbechie-Godec N Elbuluk Melasma: an Up-to-Date Comprehensive ReviewDermatol Ther (Heidelb)2017733051810.1590/s0365-05962009000600008

5 

P J Sahu A L Singh S Kulkarni B Madke V Saoji S Jawade Study of oral tranexamic acid, topical tranexamic acid, and modified Kligman's regimen in treatment of melasmaJ Cosmet Dermatol202019614566210.1111/jocd.13430

6 

V Vachiramon P Suchonwanit K Thadanipon Melasma in menJ Cosmet Dermatol2012112151710.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00613.x

7 

YT Jadotte RA Schwartz Melasma: insights and perspectivesActa Dermatovenerol Croat20101821249

8 

I Bolanca Z Bolanca K Kuna A Vukoviä N Tuckar R Herman Chloasma-the mask of pregnancyColl Antropol200832Suppl 213941

9 

MMT Colferai GM Miquelin Evaluation of oral tranexemic acid in the treatment of melasmaJ Cosmet Dermalol201918514951501

10 

HR Bala S Lee C Wong Oral tranexmic acid for the treatment of melasma. A reviewDermalol Surg201844681425

11 

A Moin Z Jabery N Fallah Prevalence and awareness of melasma during pregnancyInt J Dermatol2006453285810.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02470.x

12 

MMT Colferai GM Miquelin D Steiner Evaluation of oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasmaJ Cosmet Dermatol2009185149550110.1111/jocd.12830

13 

H J Kim S H Moon S H Cho Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in melasma: a meta-analysis and systematic reviewActa Derm Venereol201797777681

14 

VK Khurana RR Misri S Agarwal AV Thole S Kumar T Anand A randomized, open-label, comparative study oforal tranexamic acid and tranexamic acid microinjections in patientswith melasmaIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol2019851394310.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_801_16

15 

B Ebrahimi FF Naeini Topical tranexamic acid as a promising treatment for melasmaJ Res Med Sci20141987537



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 21-04-2023

Accepted : 08-05-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijced.2023.015


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2272

PDF Downloaded: 219