Get Permission Vathsala, Naveen, and Hanumantharayappa Girisha: Skin lesions in school children: A survey from schools in an urban area of south India


Introduction

Skin diseases are an important health problem in children that can lead to significant morbidity.1 The health and hygiene status of a society can be judged by the prevalence of certain diseases in the children.2  While the community based surveys are difficult and times not possible, school surveys are easy, less time consuming and a large number of children of a particular age group can be screened for the presence of d ermatoses.3 The objective of this study was to find the prevalence and pattern of dermatoses in school children at urban schools in Tumkur city of Karnataka.

Materials and Methods

Institutional ethical committee clearance was obtained before starting the study. The study was conducted in the months of November and December 2018. After taking informed consent from the school principal, a total of 534 students in the age group of 5-16 years were screened at two schools in Tumkur. Students were interviewed for age, residence, and any specific complaint related to skin followed by a detailed dermatological examination . The findings were recorded on a proforma and the students who needed investigations and treatment were called to our institute. Descriptive statistics like mean, frequency and percentage were calculated. Chisquare test was done to analyse data wherever necessary.

Results

Out of 534 students, there were 260(48.7%) boys and 274(51.3%) girls. Two hundred and eighty four (53.2%) students belonged to primary school ( 5-10yrs) and 250(46.8%) students belonged to middle and high school (11- 16) yrs.

Dermatoses were prevalent in 323 (60.48%) students. Among boys, 151(58.07%) had dermatoses and among girls 172( 62.77%) had dermatoses. Among primary school students, 170(59.85%) had dermatoses and among high school, 153(61.2%) had dermatoses. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of dermatoses among boys vs girls and primary school vs middle and high school students. Dermatoses were chategorised into three groups, 1. Infections and infestations, 2. Noninfectious dermatoses and 3. Nutritional dermatoses. Table 1 depicts the distribution of dermatoses among boys and girls and table 2 depicts the distribution of dermatoses among primary school and high school students.

Among the various dermatoses observed, noninfective dermatoses was most common, seen in 311(58.23%) students followed by infections and infestations in 79(14.8%) and nutritional dermatoses in 40(7.5%) students.

Infections and infestations were second common category of dermatoses with overall prevalence of 14.8%. Primary school students had a significantly increased number of infections compared to middle and high school students (p<0.01). There was no significant difference between boys and girls.

Pyoderma was most common infection, found in 17(3.2%) students, followed by warts in 9(1.7%), molluscum contagiosum and pityriasis versicolor in 4( 0.74% ) students each, tinea capitis (Figure 1) and tinea corporis in 2( 0.37%) students each.

Among the infestations, Pediculosis capitis (Figure 2 ) was seen in 40(7.49%) students, out of which 38(7.11%) were girls and only 2 (0.37%) were boys and the difference was significant ( p<0.01). Similarly pediculosis capitis was significantly more common among middle and high school students compared to primary school students.

Surprisingly, we did not come across any case of scabies in our study.

Non infectious dermatoses were most common category in our study with a prevalence of 58.07%. There was no significant difference in overall prevalence of noninfective dermatoses among boys vs girls and amomg primary school vs middle and hi gh school students.

Pityriasisalba and Xerosis were the most common noninfectious dermatoses and they were also the most common dermatoses found in our study, seen in 93(17.41%) and 62(11.61%) respectively. Both pityriasisalba and xerosis were significantly more common among primary school students compared to middle and high school students (p<0.01). Xerosis was more common among boys compared to girls.

Figure 1

Tinea capitis

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/a83233fc-1b1a-4d84-98f4-391293ddfc44image1.png

Figure 2

Pediculosis capitis with nits

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/a83233fc-1b1a-4d84-98f4-391293ddfc44image2.png

Figure 3

Premature canitis

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/a83233fc-1b1a-4d84-98f4-391293ddfc44image3.png

Figure 4

Angular cheilitis

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/a83233fc-1b1a-4d84-98f4-391293ddfc44image4.png

Table 1
Category of dermatoses Type of dermatoses Boys Girls Total (%) n=534 p value
Infections Pyoderma 8 9 17(3.18) 0.8912
Wart 6 3 9(1.68) 0.2764
Molloscum contagiosum 1 3 4(0.74) 0.3413
Varicella 1 0 1(0.18) 0.4869
Tinea capitis 2 0 2(0.37) 0.2366
Tinea corporis 2 0 2(0.37) 0.2366
Pityriasis versicolor 2 3 5(0.93) 0.6961
Infestations Pediculosis capitis 4 36 40(7.49) 0.000001
Nutritional dermatoses Angular cheilitis 17 14 31(5.80) 0.4803
Phrynoderma 5 4 9(1.68) 0.6766
Noninfectious dermatoses Pityriasis alba 46 47 93(17.41) 0.8696
Xerosis 38 24 62(11.61) 0.3473
Acne vulgaris 23 28 51(9.55) 0.5895
Papular urticaria 13 18 31(5.80) 0.4382
Pityriasis capitis 3 13 16(2.99) 0.1498
Polymorphic light eruption 5 7 12(2.24) 0.6225
Premature canitis 6 3 9(1.68) 0.2764
Eczema 5 1 6(1.12) 0.0877
Juvenile plantar dermatoses 3 3 6(1.12) 0.9484
Naevi 2 3 5(0.93) 0.6961
Palmoplantar hyperhydrosis 2 3 5(0.93) 0.6961
Acanthosis nigricans 1 2 3(0.56) 0.5936
Café au lait macules 1 1 2(0.37) 0.9703
Icthyosis 0 2 2(0.37) 0.4994
Keloid 2 0 2(0.37) 0.2366
Lichen planus 1 1 2(0.37) 0.9703
Morphea 1 0 1(0.18) 0.4869
Pityriasis rosea 1 0 1(0.18) 0.4869

Pattern of dermatoses among boys vs girls

Table 2
Category of dermatoses Type of dermatoses Prmary school students ( 5-10 yrs) Middle and high school students (11-16yrs) Total (%) n=534 p value
Infections Pyoderma 15 2 17(3.18) 0.0032
Wart 4 5 9(1.68) 0.5961
Molloscum contagiosum 4 0 4(0.74) 0.1266
Varicella 1 0 1(0.18) 1.0
Tinea capitis 2 0 2(0.37) 0.5011
Tinea corporis 2 0 2(0.37) 0.5011
Pityriasis versicolor 0 5 5(0.93) 0.022
Infestations Pediculosis capitis 11 29 40(7.49) 0.0011
Nutritional dermatoses Angular cheilitis 22 9 31(5.80) 0.6299
Phrynoderma 5 4 9(1.68) 0.8856
Noninfectious dermatoses Pityriasis alba 62 31 93(17.41) 0.0059
Xerosis 54 8 62(11.61) 0.0001
Acne vulgaris 0 51 51(9.55) 0.00001
Papular urticaria 24 7 31(5.80) 0.0053
Pityriasis capitis 1 15 16(2.99) 0.00036
Polymorphic light eruption 9 3 12(2.24) 0.1255
Premature canitis 3 6 9(1.68) 0.125
Eczema 3 3 6(1.12) 0.8751
Juvenile plantar dermatoses 3 3 6(1.12) 0.8751
Naevi 2 3 5(0.93) 0.5528
Palmoplantar hyperhydrosis 2 3 5(0.93) 0.5528
Acanthosis nigricans 1 2 3(0.56) 0.4895
Café au lait macules 0 2 2(0.37) 0.2187
Icthyosis 0 2 2(0.37) 0.2187
Keloid 0 2 2(0.37) 0.2187
Lichen planus 0 2 2(0.37) 0.2187
Morphea 0 1 1(0.18) 0.4682
Pityriasis rosea 0 1 1(0.18) 0.4682

Pattern of dermatoses among Primary school students vs Middle and high school students

Another common noninfectious dermatoses in our study was papular urticaria which was seen in 31(5.8%) students. It was also significantly more common among primary school students ( p<0.01). Acne vulgaris and pityriasis capitis were seen in 51(9.55%) and 16(2.99%) students respectively. They were seen only among middle and high school students except for one case of pityriasis capitis among primary school students.

Other noninfectious dermatoses found in our study were polymorphic light eruption, premature canitis (Figure 3), eczema, juvenile plantar dermatoses, naevi, palmoplantar hyperhydrosis,acanthosis nigricans, café aulait macules, icthyosis, keloid, lichen planus, morphea and pityriasis rosea. The prevalence of these dermatoses were similar among boys and girls and among primary school and middle and high school students and were statistically insignificant.

Among the nutritional deficiency dermatoses, angular cheilitis (Figure 4) was common, observed in 31(5.8%) students followed by phrynoderma in 9(1.6%) students. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of nutritional dermatoses among boys vs girls and primary school vs middle and high school students.

Discussion

Dermatoses are one of the major problems in school going children. Sociodemographic and environmental factors play a major role in determining the pattern of dermatoses in this age group.

In our study, the prevalence of skin disorders was 60.48% , which was comparable to earlier studies done by Valia et al 4 (53.6%), Jose et al5 (68.2 %), Saurabh et al 6 (69%), Upendra et al7 (72.1%) and Rao et al3 (76.65%).

Infectious dermatoses in our study was 14.8%, similar to a study done by Rao et al3 (19%). Jose et al5 (50.73%) and Bhatia V1 (63.5%) reported a high prevalence of infectious dermatoses in their study. This may be due to the conduct of study in urban schools where there is improved hygiene, more awareness about dermatoses and early seeking of health care facilities.

Pediculosis capitis was one of the common dermatoses in our study, found in 7.49% students. Rao et al3 , Basti and Radhakrishnan8 and Upendra et al ,7 reported prevalence of pediculosis as 4.13%, 6.5% and 9.2% respectively, comparable to our study. Pediulosis capitis was significanthy more common among girls similar to earlier studies. This may be attributed to the long hair and also dec reased frequeny of hair washing in them.

Among the noninfectious dermatoses, pityriasis alba and xerosis had high prevalence which was present in 17.41% and 11.61% respectively, which was comparable to study done by Jose et al5 who reported 9.23% students with of pityriasis alba and 8.21% students with xerosis. Valia et al4 and Jose et al5 also reported pityriasis alba as the most c ommon noninfectious dermatoses in their study. Basti and Radhakrishnan 8 observed xerosis as the most common dermatoses, found in 18% students in their study. Increased prevalence of xerosis in our study may also be attributed to the winter months during which we conducted the study. Xerosis was more common in primary school childern compared to middle and high school childern and boys compared to girls which was similar to study done by Upendra et al.7 Higher privalance of xerosis in primary school children may be because of the shorter length of dress worn by them and thus more exposure to old and dry winds. Higher prevalance of xerosis among boys may be due to more involvement in outdoor games.

Papular urticaria was seen in 5.8% of students which was comparable to study by Jose et al5 (2.63%) and Ghosh et al9 (4%). Papular urticaria was significantly more common among primary school students compared to middle and high school students. This may be attributed to their age as well as short dresses worn by the children in this group.

Acne was seen in 9.55% of students, comparable to studies by Upendra et al7 and Basti and Radhakrishnan 8 who reported acne in 8.6% and 9.4% of students respectively. Acne and pityriasis capitis was signifiantly more common among middle and high school students compared to primary school students owing to the hormonal changes in middle and high school students. Acne and pityriasis cpitis was also more common among girls due to the earlier onset of puberty in girls compared to boys.

Nutritional deficiency dermatoses was seen in 7.49% of students in our study, comparable to study by Rao et al3 (6.79%) and Jose et al5 (12.17%). Upendra et al7 reported less prevalence of nutritional dermatoses (1.7%) in their study, which they attributed to free nutritious meals, regular deworming and iron and folic acid supplementation for the students in their study. Limitation of our study was that the sample size was small.

Conclusions

The prevalence of dermatoses in school children was 60.48%. Noninfectious dermatoses were more common followed by infectious and nutritional deficiency dermatoses. Education regarding health, hygiene and nutrition among students, teachers and care givers is essential to reduce the burden of dermatoses among school going children. Education regarding health, hygiene and nutrition among students, teachers and care givers is essential to reduce the burden of dermatoses among school going children.

Routine school surveys help in the early detection of dermatoses thus reducing the morbidity among school children.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Extent and pattern of paediatric dermatoses in rural areas of central IndiaIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol19976312227

2 

V Kumar B R Garg M C Baruah Prevalence of dermatological diseases in school children in a semi-urban area in PondicherryIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol1988545300302

3 

G S Rao S S Kumar - Sandhya Pattern of skin diseases in an Indian villageIndian J Med Sci2003573108118

4 

R A Valia S S Pandey P Kaur G Singh Prevalence of skin diseases in Varanasi school childrenIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol1991573141144

5 

G Jose S G Vellaisamy N Govindarajan K Gopalan Prevalence of common dermatoses in school children of rural areas of Salem; a region of South IndiaIndian J Paediatr Dermatol2017183202210

6 

S Saurabh S K Sahu A Sadishkumar J C Kakkanattu I Prapath Screening for skin diseases among primary school children in a rural area of PuducherryIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol2013792268268

7 

Y . Sendur S Keswani N Pallava A . Prevalence of dermatoses among the tribal children studying in residential schools of South ChhattisgarhIndia. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol2018191520

8 

B D Basti S Radhakrishnan Prevalence of dermatological manifestations among the tribal school children of South IndiaInt J Community Med Public Health20163195762

9 

S K Ghosh D K Saha A K Roy A clinico-aetiological study of dermatoses in paediatric age groupIndian J Dermatol19954012931



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File  


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijced.2019.047


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1820

PDF Downloaded: 798