- Visibility 672 Views
- Downloads 60 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijced.2019.065
-
CrossMark
A comparative study of therapeutic efficacy of Doxycycline vsAzithromycin in patients with Acne Vulgaris
Abstract
Introduction: Acne vulgaris (AV) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease. This study aimed to study the efficacy of Doxycycline vs Azithromycin in acne vulgaris patients.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 40 acne vulgaris patients were included. Forty patients with pustules and nodules were included in this study. Group I patients were divided into two groups –Doxycycline group (100 mg OD for 12 weeks) and Azithromycin group (500 mg OD for 3 consecutive days in a week for 12 weeks). The change occurred in acne lesions were recorded every 2 weekly follow-up using global assessment improvement scale.
Results: in the present study, at the end of 12th weeks of treatment, in Doxycycline group; good to excellent response was seen in 80% cases and poor to fair in 20% patients. In Azithromycin group ; good to excellent response was seen in 70% and poor to fair in 30% patients. There is no significant difference in these two groups.
Conclusion: The study results indicate, t here is no significant difference in the efficacy between Doxycycline and Azithromycin groups. It may be suggesting that Doxycycline is equally efficacious as Azithromycin in moderate to severe degree of acne.
Introduction
Acne vulgaris (AV) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease. The prevalence of the disease ranging from 35% to 90% in young adults and adolescents.[1],[2] It is a multi- factorial disease affecting the pilosebaceous follicle characterized by comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, cysts and scars.[3]
The risk factors of acne vulgaris are genetics, exposure to industrial compounds, trauma, rubbing from tight clothing, cosmetics, emotional stress and unfavorable climate. Increased production of sebum, microbial flora abnormality, cornification of the pilosebaceous duct, inflammation and elevate d levels of androgen.[3] The disease affects the pilosebaceous units of the skin and may result in inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions and varying degrees of scarring.[4],[5],[6] And also it causes physical and psychological morbidity.[7] Thiboutot et al. suggested that acne should be recognized as a chronic disease which may also affect the patient psychologically.[8] Generally, acne vulgaris is treated with numerous topical and systemic drugs.[9] Systemic antibiotics have been the mainstay of treatment for moderate to severe acne vulgaris to date, and the effectiveness of several antibiotics, including oxytetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline and erythromycin, in treating acne has been established.[10] Although doxycycline is considered to be a first-line anti-acne antibiotic, it is known to have side effects, such as gastrointestinal symptoms, tooth discoloration, photosensitive reactions, pigmentation changes, and central nervous system effects.[11] Azithromycin is structurally related to erythromycin, and given orally. Azithromycin is characterized by immediate uptake from circulation and followed by slow release.[9] The long elimination half-life from tissue permits less-frequentadministration.[12] Azithromycin is more tissue stable, penetrates deeply into tissue and has a higher terminal half-life than erythromycin.[13] Hence, we aimed to study the efficacy of Doxycycline vs Azithromycin in patients with Acne Vulgaris.
Materials and Methods
This prospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha. Patients visiting the department of Skin & VD at SCB Medical College and Hospital were recruited as study subjects. Total number of patients were 40. The age of the study subjects was 15 to 25 years of both genders. Forty patients with mainly pustules and nodules were included in this study. Pregnant or lactating female, hypersensitive to drugs, children below 12 years of age and patients who have received either topical or oral treatment for acne in the past 4 weeks were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups, 20 in each group – Doxycycline group (100 mg OD for 12 weeks) and Azithromycin group (500 mg OD for 3 consecutive days in a week for 12 weeks). The change occurred in acne lesions were recorded every 2 weekly follow-up using global assessment improvement scale. Response to therapy grading done as, if reduction of lesions >90% as excellent, 60-90% as good response, 30-60% as fair response and <30% as poor response.
Results
In the present study, 4 0 subjects were studied. [Table 1] and [Figure 1] A,B, [Figure 2] A,B shows the response of Doxycycline vs Azithromycin.
| At the end of 2 weeks | ||||
| Drug | Poor response | Fair response | Good response | Excellent response |
| Doxycycline | 16 (80%) | 4 (20%) | 0 | 0 |
| Azithromycin | 17 (85%) | 3 (15%) | 0 | 0 |
| At the end of 4 weeks | ||||
| Doxycycline | 14 (70%) | 5 (25%) | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| Azithromycin | 15 (75%) | 4 (20%) | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| At the end of 6 weeks | ||||
| Doxycycline | 12 (60%) | 6 (30%) | 2 (10%) | 0 |
| Azithromycin | 13 (65%) | 5 (25%) | 2 (10%) | 0 |
| At the end of 8 weeks | ||||
| Doxycycline | 9 (45%) | 8 (40%) | 3 (15%) | 0 |
| Azithromycin | 9 (45%) | 9 (45%) | 2 (10%) | 0 |
| At the end of 10 weeks | ||||
| Doxycycline | 5 (25%) | 7 (35%) | 6 (30%) | 2 (10%) |
| Azithromycin | 6 (30%) | 7 (35%) | 6 (30%) | 1 (5%) |
| At the end of 12 weeks | ||||
| Doxycycline | 1 (5%) | 3 (15%) | 13 (65%) | 3 (15%) |
| Azithromycin | 3 (15%) | 3 (15%) | 10 (50%) | 4 (20%) |
At the end of 12th week s of treatment, in Doxycycline group; good to excellent response was seen in 80% cases. 20% patients responded poor to fair grade. In Azithromycin group; at the end of 12th weeks of treatment, 70% responded good to excellent. Fair to poor response was seen in rest 30% cases. There is no significant (p= 0.82) difference in the results between these two groups.
Discussion
Initial response to treatment with Doxycycline appeared at 2 weeks and peak response was noted at 8-10 weeks of treatment. At the end of treatment 95% patients showed some response but good to excellent response was seen in 80% cases only. Doxycycline reduces the number of P. Acne and Staphylococcus epidermidis. It also has effect on the generation of the reactive oxygen species.[14] Like Minocycline, Doxycycline also inhibits the formation of inflammatory granuloma. Plewig G, et al., found that 45-50% of patients has good to excellent response to Doxycycline in Acne vulgaris.[15]
In the present study, initial response to treatment with Azithromycin appeared at 2 weeks and peak response was noted at 8-10 weeks. At the end of treatment all 20 patients showed response but good to excellent response was seen in 70% cases. Azithromycin reduces the number of Corynebacterium acne and Staphylococcus epidermidis.[16] Azithromycin is acid stable, rapidly absorbed and has marked tissue distribution capacity. Antibiotics resistance with Azithromycin is also less.[17],[18] There is no significant difference in the results between these two groups. (p=0.82)
Conclusion
In the present study, good to excellent response was seen in 80% cases with Tab. Doxycycline and 20% patients showed poor to fair grade. In case of Azithromycin group, at the end of 12 weeks of treatment, 70% had good to excellent response. Fair to poor response was seen in 30% cases. There is no significant difference in the efficacy between Doxycycline and Azithromycin groups. It may be concluded that Doxycycline is equally efficacious as Azithromycin in moderate to severe degree of acne. Further studies with large sample size are recommended to confirm these findings.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Source of Funding
None.
References
- Fox L, Csongradi C, Aucamp M, Plessis JD, Gerber M. Treatment Modalities for Acne. Molecules. 1063;21:1-20. [Google Scholar]
- Bhat YJ, Latief I, Hassan I. Update on etiopathogenesis and treatment of Acne. Indian J Dermatol. 2017;83:298-306. [Google Scholar]
- MP, Bendigeri J. Mahadevi Patil and JyotiBendigeri. Clinico-epidemiological study of Acne Vulgaris in Southern India. Int J Biomed Res. 2015;6(07):509-511. [Google Scholar]
- Dessinioti C, Katsambas AD. The role of Propionibacterium acnes in acne pathogenesis: Facts andcontroversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28:2-7. [Google Scholar]
- Krautheim A, Gollnick HP. Acne: Topical treatment. Clin Dermatol. 2004;22:398-407. [Google Scholar]
- Tan AU, Schlosser BJ, Paller AS. A review of diagnosis and treatment of acne in adult female patients. Int J Women's Dermatol. 2018;4:56-71. [Google Scholar]
- Gollnick HP, Finlay AY, Shear N. Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne. Can we define acne as a chronic disease? If so, how and when?. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9:279-284. [Google Scholar]
- Thibout D, Gollnick H, Bettoli V, Drno B, Kang S, Leyden JJ. New insights into the management of acne: An update from the global alliance to improve outcomes in acne group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:1-50. [Google Scholar]
- Kim JE, Park AY, Lee SY, Park YL, Whang KU, Kim H. Comparison of the Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Acne Vulgaris: A Meta-Analysis ofnRandomized Controlled Trials. Ann Dermatol. 2018;30(4):417-426. [Google Scholar]
- AML. Optimal management of acne to prevent scarring and psychological sequelae. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2:135-141. [Google Scholar]
- Smith K, Leyden JJ. Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1329-1342. [Google Scholar]
- Peters DH, Friedel HA, Azithromycin DM. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy. Drugs. 1992;44:750-799. [Google Scholar]
- Singhi MK, Ghiya BC, Dhabhai RK. Comparison of oral azithromycin pulse with daily doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69(4):274-276. [Google Scholar]
- Akamatsu H, Asada M, Komura J, Asada Y, Niwa Y. Effect of doxycycline on the generation of reactive oxygen species. Acta Derma venerol. 1992;72:178-179. [Google Scholar]
- Plewig G, AMK. Acne and Rosacea. Acne and Rosacea. 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Marpels RR, Williamson P. Effect of systemic demethylchlortetracycline on huan cutaneous microflora. Appl Microbial. 1969;18:228-238. [Google Scholar]
- Ross JI, AEady E, Cove JH, Jones CE, Ratyal AH, Miller YW. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . . 1997;41(5):1162-1165. [Google Scholar]
- Singhi MK, Ghiya BC, Dhabhai RK. Comparison of oral azithromycin pulse with daily doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;9(4):274-276. [Google Scholar]